Este es un blog medico que nunca podrá sustituir el buen juicio médico en la toma de decisiones.Intentamos compartir con los profesionales nuestras experiencias, conocimientos,lecturas,etc con la finalidad de mejorar la practica clinica.No es un blog para pacientes aunque no rechazamos sus comentarios
SalivaDirect: A simplified and flexible platform to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity
Clinical and Translational Resource and Technology Insights|
Highlights
●
SalivaDirect is a simplified saliva-based test for detection of SARS-CoV-2
●
Testing framework is flexible to minimize the risk for supply chain issues
●
SalivaDirect is sensitive, with low rates of invalid and false positive results
●
Laboratories can be designated to use SalivaDirect to increase testing capacity
Summary
Background
Scaling SARS-CoV-2 testing to meet demands of safe reopenings continues to be plagued by assay costs and supply chain shortages. In response, we developed SalivaDirect, which received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. FDA.
Methods
We simplified our saliva-based diagnostic test by (1) not requiring collection tubes with preservatives, (2) replacing nucleic acid extraction with a simple enzymatic and heating step, and (3) testing specimens with a dualplex RT-qPCR assay. Moreover, we validated SalivaDirect with reagents and instruments from multiple vendors to minimize supply chain issues.
Findings
From our hospital cohort, we show a high positive agreement (94%) between saliva tested with SalivaDirect and nasopharyngeal swabs tested with a commercial RT-qPCR kit. In partnership with the National Basketball Association and Players Association, we tested 3,779 saliva specimens from healthy individuals, and detected low rates of invalid (0.3%) and false positive (<0.05%) results.
This study was funded by the National Basketball Association and Players Association (NDG), Huffman Family Donor Advised Fund (NDG), Fast Grant from Emergent Ventures at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University (NDG), Yale Institute for Global Health (NDG), and Beatrice Kleinberg Neuwirth Fund (AIK). CBFV is supported by NWO Rubicon 019.181EN.004.
Graphical Abstract
Article Info
Publication History
Accepted: December 21, 2020
Received in revised form: December 14, 2020
Received: December 8, 2020
Publication stage
In Press Accepted Manuscript
Cell Press Commenting Guidelines
To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:
We will review submitted comments within 2 business days.
This forum is intended for constructive dialog. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
We recommend that commenters identify themselves with full names and affiliations.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Danos tu opinion, enriquece el post.