PARTICIPA

PARTICIPA
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta vacuna. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta vacuna. Mostrar todas las entradas

domingo, 19 de septiembre de 2021

Single-dose intranasal vaccination elicits systemic and mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 - ScienceDirect


Despite remarkable progress in the development and authorization of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is a need to validate vaccine platforms for broader application. The current intramuscular vaccines are designed to elicit systemic immunity without conferring mucosal immunity in the nasal compartment, which is the first barrier that SARS-CoV-2 virus breaches before dissemination to the lung. We report the development of an intranasal subunit vaccine that uses lyophilized spike protein and liposomal STING agonist as an adjuvant. This vaccine induces systemic neutralizing antibodies, IgA in the lung and nasal compartments, and T-cell responses in the lung of mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing confirmed the coordinated activation of T/B-cell responses in a germinal center-like manner within the nasal-associated lymphoid tissues, confirming its role as an inductive site to enable durable immunity. The ability to elicit immunity in the respiratory tract can prevent the establishment of infection in individuals and prevent disease transmission.


 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221010051

domingo, 3 de diciembre de 2017

Eurosurveillance | Low interim influenza vaccine effectiveness, Australia, 1 May to 24 September 2017

Baja eficacia de la vacuna antigripal en hemisferio sur.

Eurosurveillance | Low interim influenza vaccine effectiveness, Australia, 1 May to 24 September 2017

The ongoing Australian 2017 influenza season was so far characterised by record-high laboratory-confirmed influenza notifications [], high consultation rates, high hospitalisation and mortality rates, particularly in New South Wales [], large numbers of institutional outbreaks [] and media attention. The southern hemisphere influenza vaccine used in Australia for this season was a quadrivalent formulation comprised of an A/Michigan/45/2015 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus, an A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)-like virus, a B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus (of the B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) and a B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (of the B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage) [,]. This same vaccine composition is being used in the upcoming northern hemisphere for the 2017/18 influenza season []. Here we report interim influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates for 2017 in Australia, using sentinel surveillance data.
The Australian Sentinel Practices Research Network (ASPREN) and the Victorian Sentinel Practice Influenza Network (VicSPIN) constitute Australia's two sentinel influenza general practice (GP) networks. VicSPIN operates in the state of Victoria, while ASPREN operates nationally. Both surveillance systems use similar data collection methods [,], with the key difference that the VicSPIN surveillance period is limited to weeks 18 to 43 (1 May 1– 29 October), timed to start roughly 2 weeks after vaccination campaigns in mid-April. Briefly, sentinel GPs submit weekly reports of the number of patients seen with influenza-like illness (ILI), defined as fever/history of fever, cough and fatigue, and the total number of patients. Nose/throat swabs are collected from a subset of patients with demographic data, date of ILI onset, vaccination status (self-reported or medical record) and indications for vaccination, such as belonging to an influenza risk group. Swabs are tested by RT-PCR and positive samples are referred to the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza in Melbourne, for antigenic characterisation by haemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) [] or focus reduction assay (FRA) [] and genetic sequencing, as described previously []. All data were managed and analysed using R version 3.4.1.
ILI data from ASPREN for 2017 and 2012 to 2016 (averaged) are plotted in and indicate consultation rates were higher in 2017 than in the previous 5 years. For the study period from 1 May 2017 to 24 September 2017, i.e. weeks 18–38, the 262 ASPREN GPs and 88 VicSPIN GPs conducted 493,961 consultations, of which 5,678 (1.1%) met the ILI case definition and swabs were collected from 2,465 (43%) of them. Influenza cases were detected in every week of the study period and peaked in week 34 (21–27 August, n = 235). Percentage of positive samples peaked in week 32 (7–13 August) with 58%.

Figure 1
Sentinel general practice (GP) surveillance dataa, (A) ILI consultation rates, (B) laboratory detections of influenza patients by week and type/subtype, Australia, 2 January–24 September 2017


martes, 29 de octubre de 2013

OMC: no hay razones éticas para la vacunación contra la gripe. GERVAS MEDFAM





Médicos Racionales.
Comisión Deontológica y Presidente de la Organización Médica Colegial de España (200.000 médicos).
"Ni se puede tachar en absoluto de falta de ética o deontológica la negativa del médico a vacunarse [contra la gripe], ni se puede obligar al sanitario a vacunarse con el argumento de que es un deber ético y/o deontológico".
http://www.medicosypacientes.com/articulos/ptevacunas281013.html

The President of the Spanish Medical Association and its Comission of Ethics: "No doubt, [for physicians] there is no ethical bases to justify mandatory flu vaccine, neither to question on ethical grounds the negative to vaccinate"
This Presidente also was rational during the "pandemic" 2009 (swine flu), againts WHO, CDE and ECDC position and joined the movement of "FluAndCalm" ("GripeyCalma"), a policy of common sense and self-control that helped population and patients to overcome the epidemic of panic, not to abuse Tamiflu and keep pandemic vaccine under control
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/181/9/617.1.full.pdf+html?sid=e1f856aa-b303-4532-9177-67d1ec5d8ca9

JUAN GÉRVAS, MD, PhD
--

Juan Gérvas    www.equipocesca.org

miércoles, 14 de marzo de 2012

La vacuna del papiloma nuevas noticias ahora para varones

From Medscape Education Clinical Briefs

AAP Guidelines Now Recommend HPV Vaccine for Boys CME

News Author: Steven Fox
CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD

Clinical Context

In the United States, human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the most common sexually transmitted viruses, with the highest prevalence of HPV infection in sexually active adolescents and young adults. The virus has been implicated in several cancers of the mouth and throat, cervix, and genital organs. The HPV vaccine is most effective if given before the onset of sexual activity, and antibody responses are highest at ages 9 to 15 years.
A revised policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) updates recommendations for the use of HPV vaccine in boys and young men as well as in girls and young women and includes the underlying evidence, rationale, and background to support the HPV vaccine recommendations given in the 2012 Adolescent Immunization Schedule issued February 1.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

The AAP has published new guidelines for the use of the HPV vaccine and, for the first time, has specifically recommended use of the vaccine in adolescent boys as well as girls.
The recommendations were published online February 27 and in the March print issue of Pediatrics.
The vaccine was recommended for girls in 2006, but even though at that time the AAP said the vaccine could be used in boys, it was not specifically recommended for that population.
The new recommendations were spurred in part by mounting evidence that the HPV vaccine is effective as prophylaxis against genital warts in both males and females. HPV infection has been associated with increased risk for cervical cancer, anal cancer, and oropharyngeal cancer.
The AAP recommends that the vaccine be administered at 11 to 12 years of age in both boys and girls. Their rationale is 2-fold: First, the vaccine is most effective if it is administered before the individual begins engaging in sexual activity, mainly because the vaccine is inactive against HPV strains acquired before vaccination. Second, children mount the most robust antibody responses to the vaccine when they are between the ages of 9 and 15 years, the AAP says.
Two HPV vaccines are currently available in the United States, but there are differences in their approved indications. Quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) is the only vaccine approved for use in boys. Bivalent HPV vaccine (HPV2) is only approved for use in girls; HPV4 is also approved for girls.
Among the AAP's updated recommendations are that:
  • Girls aged 11 to 12 years should be routinely immunized using 3 doses of the HPV4 or HPV2 vaccine, administered intramuscularly at 0, 1 to 2, and 6 months.
  • Girls and women aged from 13 to 26 years who have not been previously immunized or who have not completed their vaccinations should finish the series.
  • Boys aged 11 to 12 years should be routinely immunized with HPV4, using the same schedule as for girls.
  • Boys and men aged from 13 to 21 years who have not already been immunized or who have not completed their vaccines should finish the series.
  • Men aged from 22 to 26 years who have not already been immunized or who have not finished the full series may be administered the recommended vaccine. (The AAP guidelines note that "cost-efficacy models do not justify a stronger recommendation in this age group.")
  • Special efforts should be made to target use of the vaccine in gay or bisexual men up to 26 years of age who have not previously received the vaccine.
  • People infected with HIV should be vaccinated or complete their series of vaccinations.
  • The vaccine is not recommended during pregnancy, nor should it be administered to individuals with a known immediate hypersensitivity to yeast. However, it may be administered during lactation, as well as to those who are immunocompromised from either illness or medication
The AAP recommends that because the HPV vaccine will not prevent infection from all types of HPV types, cervical screening should continue after HPV vaccination.
The organization also says that administration of the vaccine should not alter physicians' recommendations regarding use of barrier methods for preventing HPV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
The AAP urges that use of the vaccine be covered by all public and private health insurance.
More information on implementing the guidelines, including guidance on supply, payment, coding, and liability issues, is available on the AAP's Web site.
The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Pediatrics. 2012;129:602-605.

miércoles, 8 de febrero de 2012