PARTICIPA

PARTICIPA

viernes, 26 de febrero de 2021

Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II): protocol for an observational study using linked Scottish national data | BMJ Open


Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II): protocol for an observational study using linked Scottish national data

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • We plan to interrogate national data on the Scottish general population.

  • We are expanding an existing national pandemic reporting platform, which uses anonymised individual patient-level data from general practices, hospitals, death registry, virology (reverse transcriptase PCR) and serology tests to investigate the epidemiology of COVID-19 and assess the effectiveness of existing or future preventive and treatment measures.

  • This is an observational study; therefore, insufficient adjustment for confounding, either due to insufficiently granular variable measurement or a lack of variable measurement, is a potential concern.


domingo, 21 de febrero de 2021

Interview with Dr. Perri Klass on vaccinating children against Covid-19, including lessons from measles vaccination campaigns. | NEJM

A comparison of performance metrics for cloth face masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols | medRxiv

Association Between Nursing Home Crowding and COVID-19 Infection and Mortality in Ontario, Canada | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network

Poor antigen-specific responses to the second BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine dose in SARS-CoV-2-experienced individuals | medRxiv

viernes, 19 de febrero de 2021

Severe clinical relapse in an immunocompromised host with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection | Leukemia


Severe clinical relapse in an immunocompromised host with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection

Infectious medicine virology

Leukemia (2021)Cite this article

  • 105 Altmetric


Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials - The Lancet



La vacuna parece proteger de enfermedad que precisa ingreso y de infección 60-70%. Este porcentaje de protección aumenta si la segunda dosis se retrasa mas de 12 semanas frente al hacerlos antes

Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials

Summary

Background

The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine has been approved for emergency use by the UK regulatory authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, with a regimen of two standard doses given with an interval of 4–12 weeks. The planned roll-out in the UK will involve vaccinating people in high-risk categories with their first dose immediately, and delivering the second dose 12 weeks later. Here, we provide both a further prespecified pooled analysis of trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and exploratory analyses of the impact on immunogenicity and efficacy of extending the interval between priming and booster doses. In addition, we show the immunogenicity and protection afforded by the first dose, before a booster dose has been offered.

Methods

We present data from three single-blind randomised controlled trials—one phase 1/2 study in the UK (COV001), one phase 2/3 study in the UK (COV002), and a phase 3 study in Brazil (COV003)—and one double-blind phase 1/2 study in South Africa (COV005). As previously described, individuals 18 years and older were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two standard doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (5 × 1010 viral particles) or a control vaccine or saline placebo. In the UK trial, a subset of participants received a lower dose (2·2 × 1010 viral particles) of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 for the first dose. The primary outcome was virologically confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 disease, defined as a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive swab combined with at least one qualifying symptom (fever ≥37·8°C, cough, shortness of breath, or anosmia or ageusia) more than 14 days after the second dose. Secondary efficacy analyses included cases occuring at least 22 days after the first dose. Antibody responses measured by immunoassay and by pseudovirus neutralisation were exploratory outcomes. All cases of COVID-19 with a NAAT-positive swab were adjudicated for inclusion in the analysis by a masked independent endpoint review committee. The primary analysis included all participants who were SARS-CoV-2 N protein seronegative at baseline, had had at least 14 days of follow-up after the second dose, and had no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection from NAAT swabs. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. The four trials are registered at ISRCTN89951424 (COV003) and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606 (COV001), NCT04400838 (COV002), and NCT04444674 (COV005).

Findings

Between April 23 and Dec 6, 2020, 24 422 participants were recruited and vaccinated across the four studies, of whom 17 178 were included in the primary analysis (8597 receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 8581 receiving control vaccine). The data cutoff for these analyses was Dec 7, 2020. 332 NAAT-positive infections met the primary endpoint of symptomatic infection more than 14 days after the second dose. Overall vaccine efficacy more than 14 days after the second dose was 66·7% (95% CI 57·4–74·0), with 84 (1·0%) cases in the 8597 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 248 (2·9%) in the 8581 participants in the control group. There were no hospital admissions for COVID-19 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group after the initial 21-day exclusion period, and 15 in the control group. 108 (0·9%) of 12 282 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 127 (1·1%) of 11 962 participants in the control group had serious adverse events. There were seven deaths considered unrelated to vaccination (two in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 group and five in the control group), including one COVID-19-related death in one participant in the control group. Exploratory analyses showed that vaccine efficacy after a single standard dose of vaccine from day 22 to day 90 after vaccination was 76·0% (59·3–85·9). Our modelling analysis indicated that protection did not wane during this initial 3-month period. Similarly, antibody levels were maintained during this period with minimal waning by day 90 (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·59–0·74]). In the participants who received two standard doses, after the second dose, efficacy was higher in those with a longer prime-boost interval (vaccine efficacy 81·3% [95% CI 60·3–91·2] at ≥12 weeks) than in those with a short interval (vaccine efficacy 55·1% [33·0–69·9] at <6 weeks). These observations are supported by immunogenicity data that showed binding antibody responses more than two-fold higher after an interval of 12 or more weeks compared with an interval of less than 6 weeks in those who were aged 18–55 years (GMR 2·32 [2·01–2·68]).

Interpretation

The results of this primary analysis of two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were consistent with those seen in the interim analysis of the trials and confirm that the vaccine is efficacious, with results varying by dose interval in exploratory analyses. A 3-month dose interval might have advantages over a programme with a short dose interval for roll-out of a pandemic vaccine to protect the largest number of individuals in the population as early as possible when supplies are scarce, while also improving protection after receiving a second dose.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR), The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lemann Foundation, Rede D'Or, the Brava and Telles Foundation, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.


Early rate reductions of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 in BNT162b2 vaccine recipients

martes, 16 de febrero de 2021

domingo, 14 de febrero de 2021

Genetic Variants of SARS-CoV-2—What Do They Mean? | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2775006?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=021321#.YCggqjph8EU.twitter


Enviado desde mi iPhone

Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in the COVID-19 response - The Lancet

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31067-9/fulltext


Enviado desde mi iPhone

Avances en gestión clínica: La atención a los pacientes crónicos durante la pandemia. 5 propuestas desde los hospitales

http://gestionclinicavarela.blogspot.com/2021/02/la-atencion-los-pacientes-cronicos.html


Enviado desde mi iPhone

Tweet de Chris Martey en Twitter



Enviado desde mi iPhone

sábado, 13 de febrero de 2021

vacunas covid


Challenges in the virtual assessment of COVID-19 infections in the community | The College of Family Physicians of Canada


Challenges in the virtual assessment of COVID-19 infections in the community


Assessing Brain Capillaries in Coronavirus Disease 2019 | Infectious Diseases | JAMA Neurology | JAMA Network

Natural killer respuesta celular variantes covid.

Reaccion anafilacticas y vacuna

https://analytics.twitter.com/mob_idsync_click?slug=oSkySHaKrI&idb=AAAAEICgnjyCI3d7u2dhuxdiDZDeN3yokRhFNvY1Br6nOuOpIQuhiGGvabrXmHhmHoFUImZSVsW_GhxlM6J-nZEyW8aADs5J_RDAZdmYjfoBIktQ0P8QW4tvzuXZEVtXoSHGux33jWikca-EcEZ0VB6N80im83tBvaiQ7aOf46WJIuysLyKEb11MqNVjPJUIYKtAXjHC_OM_u34cFWx04nvhui_RhzKYIlf9fxzVkrVAVd4jdleXqJ_kl9pzq6iLrtjSxM1MbkV1cNFx_s2Uio-MZw&ad_tracking=true&tailored_ads=true


Enviado desde mi iPhone

martes, 9 de febrero de 2021

Seasonal human coronavirus antibodies are boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection but not associated with protection: Cell


Seasonal human coronavirus antibodies are boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection but not associated with protection

Some humans possessed cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies prior to the pandemic
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread within the human population. Although SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus, most humans had been previously exposed to other antigenically distinct common seasonal human coronaviruses (hCoVs) before the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we quantified levels of SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies and hCoV-reactive antibodies in serum samples collected from 431 humans before the COVID-19 pandemic. We then quantified pre-pandemic antibody levels in serum from a separate cohort of 251 individuals who became PCR-confirmed infected with SARS-CoV-2. Finally, we longitudinally measured hCoV and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the serum of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Our studies indicate that most individuals possessed hCoV-reactive antibodies before the COVID-19 pandemic. We determined that ∼20% of these individuals possessed non-neutralizing antibodies that cross-reacted with SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins. These antibodies were not associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections or hospitalizations, but they were boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Variants v. Vaccines - Tomas Pueyo


Variants v. Vaccines

The Race between the Tortoise and the Hare

German translation