The efficacy of a medication review programme conducted in an emergency department Authors

Authors Authors and affiliations R. Santolaya-PerrínEmail authorB. Calderón-HernanzG. Jiménez-DíazN. Galán-RamosM. T. Moreno-CarvajalJ. M. Rodríguez-CamachoP. Serra-SimóJ. C. García-OrtizJ. Tarradas-TorrasA. Ginés-PalomaresI. Sánchez-Navarro Background Older age and inappropriate prescribing is related to a greater rate of emergency department visits and hospitalisations. Objective To assess the efficacy of an interprofessional collaboration programme in which a review of the medication of older patients seen in the emergency observation unit was carried out. Setting Emergency departments at four Spanish hospitals. Method Randomised, controlled study. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to the emergency department were randomised to a control or an intervention group. In the intervention group, a pharmacist reviewed the patients’ chronic medication and identified any potentially inappropriate prescriptions based on the STOPP/START criteria. Each case was discussed with the emergency specialist and a recommendation to modify the treatment was sent to the general practitioner. Main outcome measure Rate of emergency visits and hospital admissions. Results The adjusted rate ratio of emergency visits and hospital admissions was 0.808 (95% CI 0.617 to 1.059) at 3 months, 0.888 (95% CI 0.696 to 1.134) at 6 months and 0.954 (95% CI 0.772 to 1.179) at 12 months. There was a statistically significant reduction at 3 months in two of the hospitals that participated in the study [adjusted rate ratio at 3 months was 0.452 (95% CI 0.222 to 0.923) in hospital 3 and 0.567 (95% CI 0.328 to 0.983) in hospital 4]. Conclusion Overall, the intervention did not reduce the number of emergency visits and hospital admissions. However, a significant effect was observed in centres were a high acceptance rate of treatment recommendations was achieved. Keywords Clinical pharmacy Emergency department Medication review Potentially inappropriate prescriptions Primary care Spain STOPP/START criteria This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Notes Acknowledgements Redfaster Group of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) is thanked for their collaboration. Funding This project was supported by the working group REDFASTER of SEFH and was awarded a grant in the call for research projects for this association’s working groups. Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. References 1. Chen Y-C, Huang H-H, Fan J-S, Chen MH, Hsu TF, Yen DH, et al. Comparing characteristics of adverse drug events between older and younger adults presenting to a Taiwan emergency department. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 2. Dormann H, Sonst A, Müller F, Vogler R, Patapovas A, Pfistermeister B, et al. Adverse drug events in older patients admitted as an emergency: the role of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly people (PRISCUS). Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2013;110:213–9. Google Scholar 3. Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013–2014. JAMA. 2016;316:2115–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 4. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, et al. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370:173–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 5. San-José A, Agustí A, Vidal X, Formiga F, López-Soto A, García J, et al. Inappropriate prescribing to older patients admitted to hospital: a comparison of different tools of misprescribing and underprescribing. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:710–6. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 6. Yeste-Gómez I, Durán-García ME, Muiño-Miguez A, Gómez-Antúnez M, Gómez-Antúnez O, Sanjurjo-Sáez M. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in the ambulatory treatment of elderly patients. Rev Calid Asist. 2014;29:22–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 7. Hudhra K, García-Caballos M, Jucja B, Casado-Fernández E, Espigares-Rodriguez E, Bueno-Cavanillas A, et al. Frequency of potentially inappropriate prescriptions in older people at discharge according to Beers and STOPP criteria. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:596–603. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 8. Ensing HT, Stuijt CCM, van den Bemt BJF, van Dooren AA, Karapinar-Çarkit F, Koster ES, et al. Identifying the optimal role for pharmacists in care transitions: a systematic review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:614–36. Google Scholar 9. Hatah E, Braund R, Tordoff J, Duffull SB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led fee-for-services medication review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77:102–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 10. Nickel CH, Ruedinger JM, Messmer AS, Maile S, Peng A, Bodmer M, et al. Drug-related emergency department visits by elderly patients presenting with non-specific complaints. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 11. McLachlan CYL, Yi M, Ling A, Jardine DL. Adverse drug events are a major cause of acute medical admission. Intern Med J. 2014;44:633–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 12. Castro I, Guardiola JM, Tuneu L, Sala ML, Faus MJ, Mangues MA. Drug-related visits to the emergency department in a Spanish university hospital. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35:727–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 13. Bayoumi I, Dolovich L, Hutchison B, Holbrook A. Medication-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations among older adults. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:e217–22. Google Scholar 14. Tomás S, Chanovas M, Roqueta F, Alcaraz J, Cepeda TT. EVADUR: eventos adversos ligados a la asistencia en los servicios de urgencias de hospitales españoles. Emergencias 2010;22:415–28. http://fidisp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/EVADUR.pdf. Accessed 17 September 2018. 15. Bjeldbak-Olesen M, Danielsen AG, Tomsen DV, Jakobsen TJ. Medication reconciliation is a prerequisite for obtaining a valid medication review. Dan Med J. 2013;60(4):A4605. Google Scholar 16. American College of Emergency Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines Task Force. Geriatric emergency department guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63:e7–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 17. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on emergency medicine pharmacists services. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60:1993–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 18. Jacknin G, Nakamura T, Smally AJ, Ratzan RM. Using pharmacists to optimize patient outcomes and costs in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:673–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 19. Roulet L, Asseray N, Ballereau F. Establishing a pharmacy presence in the emergency department: opportunities and challenges in the French setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:471–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 20. Santolaya-Perrín R, Jiménez-Díaz G, Galán-Ramos N, Moreno Carvajal MT, Rodríguez-Camacho JM, Sierra-Sánchez JF, et al. A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of a multidisciplinary health care team on morbidity and mortality of elderly patients attending the Emergency Department. Study design and preliminary results. Farm Hosp. 2016;40(5):371–84. Google Scholar 21. O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C. Gallagher P STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44:213–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 22. Climente Martí M, Jiménez Torres V. Manual de Atención Farmacéutica. Tercera. Valencia: AFAHPE, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset; 2005. p. 164. http://www.sefh.es/bibliotecavirtual/manual_AF/Manual_AF05_3edHpeset.pdf. Accessed 11 September 2018. 23. Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J. The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9:430–4. Google Scholar 24. Galván-Banqueri M, González-Méndez AI, Alfaro-Lara ER, Nieto-Martín MD, Pérez-Guerrero C, Santos-Ramos B. Evaluación de la adecuación del tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes pluripatológicos. Aten Primaria. 2013;45:235–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 25. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 26. Okere AN, Renier CM, Tomsche JJ. Evaluation of the influence of a pharmacist-led patient-centered medication therapy management and reconciliation service in collaboration with emergency department physicians. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:298–306. Google Scholar 27. Shaw PB, Delate T, Lyman A Jr, Adams J, Kreutz H, Sanchez JK, et al. Impact of a clinical pharmacy specialist in an emergency department for seniors. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67:177–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 28. Gillespie U, Alassaad A, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Mörlin C, Henrohn D, Bertilsson M, et al. Effects of pharmacists’ interventions on appropriateness of prescribing and evaluation of the instruments’ (MAI, STOPP and STARTs’) ability to predict hospitalization—analyses from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62401. CrossRefGoogle Scholar 29. Mekonnen AB, McLachlan AJ, Brien J-AE. Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010003. CrossRefGoogle Scholar